The Second Sex

Beauvoir’s central argument is that humanity is perceived as fundamentally male. In this framework, man is the "One"—the absolute subject—while woman is the "Other." She is defined not by her own merits or identity, but by her relationship to man. As Beauvoir famously puts it: "humanity is male, and man defines woman not herself, but as relative to him."

She rejects the idea that biology is destiny. While acknowledging that reproduction places a physiological burden on women, she argues that these biological facts only take on meaning within a social and economic context. By treating man as the "default" human, society forces women to view themselves as an exception or a secondary variation of the human experience.

Beauvoir dismantles the idea of innate "femininity," arguing that gender is a social construct imposed from childhood. While a boy is encouraged to be a "little man" and exert his will on the world, a girl is taught to accept a passive destiny. This process often involves the girl viewing her own body—specifically through puberty and the discovery of sex—with disgust or as a painful "weaning" from her own autonomy.

This conditioning creates a "feminine" character characterized by "immanence" (stagnation and inwardness) rather than "transcendence" (action and outward growth). By the time a woman reaches adulthood, she has been trained to worship male authority and seek fulfillment through others, a transformation that "imperiously modifies her consciousness of herself."

Beauvoir describes marriage as a "perverted institution" that dooms women to the repetitive, life-denying labor of housework—an act she describes as "holding away death but also refusing life." The division of labor turns the wife into a "vassal" whose dignity is found only in "service" to her husband and children. She argues that marriage almost always destroys the woman’s potential for independent growth.

Similarly, she views the lack of reproductive freedom as a form of "masculine sadism." She argues that pregnancy can turn a woman into a "passive instrument" of the species, stripping her of her individuality. To combat this, Beauvoir advocates for legal abortion and socialist child-rearing practices to break the cycle of "maternal sadomasochism" and allow women to participate in production and public life.

The book analyzes how male writers and philosophers have historically mythologized women as "mysterious." Beauvoir argues that "mystery" is not an inherent female trait but a condition common to any oppressed group. When one group is kept in a state of subjection, the oppressor views their silence or different perspective as a mystical secret rather than a result of their restricted social situation.

She critiques literary figures like D.H. Lawrence and Henry de Montherlant for demanding "feminine devotion" as a duty. In their works, the "ideal" woman is always defined by her utility to the man—whether as a "soul-sister," a "female animal," or a "woman-child." These myths serve to trap women in a "privileged Other" status, preventing them from being seen as peers or fully human beings.

Upon its 1949 release, The Second Sex was an immediate sensation, selling 22,000 copies in a single week. However, its frank discussion of female sexuality and its challenge to the patriarchy sparked intense hostility. The Vatican placed it on its List of Prohibited Books, and intellectual peers like Albert Camus accused Beauvoir of "ridiculing the French male."

Beauvoir noted that the vitriol—which included people sniggering at her in restaurants and professors "hurling the book across the room"—was a reaction to the threat of equality. Despite the backlash, the work became the foundational text for second-wave feminism, providing the philosophical vocabulary needed to challenge the "historical insignificance" that had previously doomed women to a sense of inferiority.

*